Unesco warns that Stonehenge will go on its hazard record until plans…

Stonehenge’s standing as a world heritage web site might be beneath menace if plans for the tunnel stay in place

Unesco has warned that Stonehenge might be placed on its record of World Heritage websites in peril if plans to construct a tunnel beneath the prehistoric web site in Wiltshire should not modified. Unesco’s warning comes on the eve of a judicial assessment scheduled to happen on the High Court in London from 23 to 25 June which can look at the UK authorities’s choice to greenlight the three.3-kilometre tunnel. Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, approved the £1.7bn redevelopment project last November.

Stonehenge’s standing as a world heritage web site might be beneath menace if plans for the tunnel stay in place, says the Times. The High Court listening to in London will even affect Unesco’s choice. “It is recommended that the [World Heritage] committee consider the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger in the event that DCO consent [development consent order] was confirmed by the High Court. Such a decision would exacerbate this threat,” says Unesco in a report revealed yesterday.

Unesco adds: “The proposed tunnel length remains inadequate to protect the OUV (outstanding universal value) of the property. As both the 2018 World Heritage Centre/Icomos advisory mission and, subsequently, the [World Heritage} Committee have advised, a longer tunnel section… is required in order to avoid highly adverse and irreversible impact on OUV, particularly on the integrity of the property.”

The authorities firm often called the Highways Agency introduced final November that it’ll transfer forward with plans to construct a tunnel diverting site visitors away from the traditional web site. The new reconfiguration entails rerouting the A303 highway, which runs close to Stonehenge into a brand new dual-carriageway tunnel whereas the present A303 might be changed into a public walkway. “It is regretted that for such an iconic World Heritage property, the argument persists that the perceived benefits of a longer tunnel do not outweigh the costs.” Unesco provides.

Unesco says it can contemplate the standing of Stonehenge at its forty fifth session in 2022 with a view to contemplating the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger if the A303 route improve scheme shouldn’t be modified. The World Heritage committee has known as on the federal government to offer an replace on its plans for Stonehenge by February subsequent 12 months.

Unesco also says that Liverpool waterfront must be faraway from its record of World Heritage Sites after warning repeatedly that it’s involved about extreme growth on the historic UK metropolis port.

The waterfront was listed as “at risk” in 2012 when the Liverpool Waters regeneration scheme, which can remodel the Northern Docklands space of the town, was launched. The £5bn venture entails constructing various high-rise developments which blight the realm, says Unesco.

Another new growth, Everton’s soccer floor at Bramley Moore Dock, added to the “ascertained threat of further deterioration and loss of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property”.

Robert Jenrick, the UK’s communities secretary, tweeted that this was a “disappointing move by Unesco” and that Unesco ought to assist imaginative city regeneration. Dan Hicks, a curator on the Pitt Rivers Museum and professor of up to date archaeology on the University of Oxford, responded: “Hang on is it ‘Retain and Explain’—or “support imaginative urban regeneration”?

A closing choice might be made when Unesco confirms the websites on its World Heritage record at its convention in China subsequent month.

 » Get Full Story

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply